Isang Kumbersasyong Analisis sa Turn-Taking ng Tatlong Henerasyon ng Kababaihan sa Isang Panayam
CJ Ann Bala, Maricel Esoy, Rohannie Mamongcal, Cherry Mae Villastique, Alican Pandapatan
Received: 12 May 2026; Revised: 21 June 2026; Accepted: 23 June 2026; Published: 25 June 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.66074/Z5Q1V9F2
Abstrak
Nilayon ng pananaliksik na ito na analisahin ang kumbersasyon ng kababaihan na mula sa tatlong magkakaibang henerasyon. Ginamit sa pananaliksik ang Conversational Analysis (CA) na nakaangkla sa mga prinsipyo nina Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, at Gail Jefferson (1974) upang masuri ang mga linggwistik na pahiwatig at dinamika ng interaksyon sa isang panayam. Natuklasan sa pag-aaral na ang paggamit ng backchannels at fillers ay nagsisilbing mahalagang estratehiya upang mapanatili ang daloy ng usapan nang hindi inaagaw ang turno ng nagsasalita. Lumitaw din na ang overlap ay kadalasang kolaboratibo at ginagamit sa pagbuo ng kahulugan, pagpapakita ng pagsang-ayon, at aktibong pakikinig, samantalang ang interruption ay may dalawang anyo: bilang pagsuporta at bilang pag-agaw ng turno upang baguhin ang direksyon ng diskurso. Lumitaw rin sa pag-aaral na ang edad ay may impluwensiya sa turn-taking ng mga kalahok. Gayunpaman, napanatili pa rin na magaan ang usapan at kolaboratibo ang interaksyon ng mga kalahok, hindi itinuring na negatibo ang overlap at interruption, ngunit ito ay pagpapahayag ng pag-unawa, at pagrespeto sa pagpapahayag ng bawat isa. Sa kabuuan, ipinakita ng pag-aaral na ang overlap at interruption ay bahagi ng kolaboratibong paggawa ng kahlugan at pagpapanatili ng interaksyon.
Susing Salita: henerasyon, interruption, kababaihan, overlap, turn-taking
Corresponding Author Information: Mindanao State University-Main Campus, Marawi, Philippines; alican.pandapatan@msumain.edu.ph
Volume 2, Issue 2, June 2026
View English Title and Abstract Here
A Conversation Analysis of Turn-taking among Three Generation of Women in an Interview
This research aimed to analyze the conversation of women belonging to three different generations. The research employed Conversation Analysis (CA), anchored in the principles of Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson (1974), to examine the linguistic cues and interactional dynamics found in an interview. The findings revealed that the use of backchannels and fillers served as important strategies in maintaining the flow of conversation without taking over the speaker’s turn. The study also found that overlaps were often collaborative in nature and were used in constructing meaning, expressing agreement, and demonstrating active listening. Meanwhile, interruptions appeared in two forms: as supportive responses and as attempts to take over the floor in order to redirect the discourse. The findings further showed that age influenced turn-taking behavior in conversation. Nevertheless, the interaction among participants remained light and collaborative, as overlaps and interruptions were not treated negatively but were instead interpreted as expressions of understanding and respect toward one another’s ideas. Overall, the study demonstrates that overlap and interruption function as part of the collaborative construction of meaning and the maintenance of interaction.
